Innovation in Journalism

This site provides a compilation of outstanding examples of journalism in the field of meteorology or climatology.

Astrid Rommetveit won the EMS Journalist Award 2017 for her very important work in helping to bridge the gap in understanding between experts and non-experts.
She was nominated for the Journalist Award on the basis of three articles published on the popular Norwegian websites and between 2015 and 2017. Yr is a cooperation between NRK and the Norwegian Meteorological Institute.

Astrid Rommetveit is a Journalist with the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation NRK (photo on the left: NRK)
As a journalist, she specializes on weather and climate, committing herself to tell important stories to a broad public. She is striving to make complex issues accessible, relevant and understandable to the readers. ‘I wan’t to show the big picture by telling “small” stories, often focusing on single persons’.

Her articles have a strong human touch combined with science, which makes them interesting to the general public. They address successfully different aspects and facts, focusing on “small” stories and single persons, using people’s statements. She provides a lively account by developing stories using people’s statements to present facts and different points of view in sometimes controversial stories.

Her chemtrails article makes it clear that the intention of the journalist is to discuss and discover, rather than pre-judge or condescend. It is of great importance to have journalists, such as Rommetveit, who is willing to cope with the facts without using false balance to give a misleading impression of objectivity.

All articles are well-structured, well-written, easy to read, with relevant images, and well-documented with scientific facts. They help bridging the communication gap between scientific achievements and research results and the public, presenting different points of view for complex topics.

Stéphane Foucart was selected for the EMS Journalist Award 2015.
He regularly publishes articles on the environment and climate change in the “Planet” section of “Le Monde”. He was nominated for the Journalist Award on the basis of three recent articles published in “Le Monde”:

In his articles, Stéphane Foucart is addressing climate change and its social and environment impact, highlighting the different aspects (e.g. in the context of history and politics) and reporting the recent scientific facts, while keeping a high level of objectiveness.

He is vigilant to detect and expose misleading information about climate change and he is reporting in an understandable way the scientific facts about the environment, the climate and also about climate change in the context of politics. These implications of climate and climate change are rarely addressed by meteorologists or climatologists, but are of utmost importance. Foucart adds to the scientific facts the perspective of a competent journalist, placing climate change into a broader frame. This is an impressive work.

Stéphane Foucart has been working for “Le Monde” for 15 years now, and he is the journal’s environmental sciences correspondent since 2007. He is also the author of books investigating the corporate influence on science (Le Populisme climatique, 2010, and La Fabrique du mensonge, 2013).

John Sweeney won the first EMS Award for Achievements in Journalism in 2014.

John Sweeney is Emeritus Professor at the Irish Climate Analysis and Research UnitS (ICARUS) at the National University of Ireland Maynooth. For the past few decades he has been the main communicator of information about climate change, extreme weather and other meteorological information to the Irish public through all forms of journalistic media.

See some examples of his interviews and articles:

Considerations which are important when communicating messages relating to climate change – by John Sweeny:

  • Tailor your message to the target audience concerned.
  • A communication with a broadsheet newspaper is very different to a soundbite on local radio. Although the temptation is to impress one’s peers with the former, for the latter it is important to express a message more directly, without equivocation. This is much more difficult than often appreciated, but essential if the message is to hit home.
  • Decide in advance what the key message is and do not be deflected from this.
  • Interviewers vary enormously. Some are well versed in the science, others are not. Questions may therefore appear lightweight, rather populist, and not what you have anticipated. If necessary the question should be used as a general platform only to convey your intended message.
  • Avoid misplaced ideas of professional and academic ‘snobbery’
    There are professional atmospheric scientists who look down on those who participate in media activities, considering them to be ‘pseudo’ scientists who betray scientific purity and excessively simplify its complexity. There is no justification for this, such are the major problems global society faces. In many areas atmospheric scientists can, and must, make key contributions. Journalism and media activities by young atmospheric scientists requires particular courage in this area and must be strongly supported.


By continuing to use the site, you agree to our privacy policy and the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.